急，翻一篇文章，翻成英语

基本上，作者所提出的文化差异辨证，本身也有可议之处。||It is basic to ascend, author a cultural difference for putting forward dialectics, oneself also have can the place of the argument.作者在文中提出地球形状的例子，来说明『不相信』并不代表『不存在』，因此「各种文化有不同意见」并不代表「没有客观道德标准」。||It is basic to ascend, author a cultural difference for putting forward dialectics, oneself also have can the place of the argument.The author puts forward the example of the Earth shape in text, explain" do not believe" and do not represent the " nonexistent", for this reason" every kind of culture contain different opinion" and do not represent" have no the objective morals standard".不过这样的论证的例子，从「可知的知识层面」谈到「各种文化的习俗」，却是相当不同的两种情形；因为地球形状是可以用各种方法加以验证的，最终可以得到一个正确答案；但是道德标准却是因人而异、随文化而变的，即使真有绝对客观的真理，又应该以何种文化为标准呢||It is basic to ascend, author a cultural difference for putting forward dialectics, oneself also have can the place of the argument.The author puts forward the example of the Earth shape in text, explain" do not believe" and do not represent the " nonexistent", for this reason" every kind of culture contain different opinion" and do not represent" have no the objective morals standard".The example of however such argument, speak of" every kind of cultural custom" from" then of knowledge level", is very different two kinds of situations however;Because the Earth shape is to take into the verification with every kind of method of, end get a right answer;But, the morals standard is to varies from person to person, with culture but change of, really have the objective the truth in absoluteness even, should regard growing the culture why as the standard again?道德并不像科学知识般可以加以验证的。||Morals and unlike the scientific knowledge sort can take into the verification||Morals and unlike the scientific knowledge sort can take into the verification.

此外，既然文化相对主义主张文化没有优劣之分，那麼第一点提到的奴隶制度与屠杀犹太人的行为本身就已经是一种文化与人种的社会达尔文主义；作者提出我们应该批判纳粹德国与奴隶制度的不道德行为，不过这两种情形都是在「文化有优劣之别」的架构下所形塑而成的，因为这两者都是相信本身文化优於它种民族(与文化相对论的基本要素不合)，因此，也许我们应该重新检视纳粹德国与奴隶制度种种暴行的因果关系。||In addition, since the opposite doctrine in culture lays claim to the culture without the cent of the good and bad, slave"s system that that the firstly of 麼 mention and kill the Jewish behavior oneself have been social Darwinism that a kind of culture and human race;The author puts forward we should criticize Nazi Germany and institutional dirty pool in slave, however these two kinds of situations is all a structure in" culture contain good and bad it do not" bottom a form 塑 but of, because this both and all is cause and effect that belief oneself excellent 於 in culture it grow the race( out of accordance with an essential element of the culture theory of relativity), therefore, perhaps we should examine Nazi Germany afresh relate to with slave"s system all kinds unruly conducts.如果世界都能普遍采用文化相对主义，那麼或许就没有上述所产生的问题了。||In addition, since the opposite doctrine in culture lays claim to the culture without the cent of the good and bad, slave"s system that that the firstly of 麼 mention and kill the Jewish behavior oneself have been social Darwinism that a kind of culture and human race; The author puts forward we should criticize Nazi Germany and institutional dirty pool in slave, however these two kinds of situations is all a structure in" culture contain good and bad it do not" bottom a form 塑 but of, because this both and all is cause and effect that belief oneself excellent 於 in culture it grow the race( out of accordance with an essential element of the culture theory of relativity), therefore, perhaps we should examine Nazi Germany afresh relate to with slave"s system all kinds unruly conducts.If world can opposite doctrine in culture in widespread adoption, that 麼 had no above a problem for producing probably||In addition, since the opposite doctrine in culture lays claim to the culture without the cent of the good and bad, slave"s system that that the firstly of 麼 mention and kill the Jewish behavior oneself have been social Darwinism that a kind of culture and human race; The author puts forward we should criticize Nazi Germany and institutional dirty pool in slave, however these two kinds of situations is all a structure in" culture contain good and bad it do not" bottom a form 塑 but of, because this both and all is cause and effect that belief oneself excellent 於 in culture it grow the race( out of accordance with an essential element of the culture theory of relativity), therefore, perhaps we should examine Nazi Germany afresh relate to with slave"s system all kinds unruly conducts.If world can opposite doctrine in culture in widespread adoption, that 麼 had no above a problem for producing probably.

作者并不十分赞同文化相对论的论点，他提出接受文化相对论的代价之一，就是「我们不能再去批判某一个社会的习俗在「道德」上较低劣的，因为没有任何客观的标准存在。」||Author and not quite agree with the talk point of the culture theory of relativity, he put forward one of the price that accept the culture theory of relativity, is" we can"t criticize again a certain and social custom at" morals" the top is lower and inferior because of having no any objective standard esse||Author and not quite agree with the talk point of the culture theory of relativity, he put forward one of the price that accept the culture theory of relativity, is" we can"t criticize again a certain and social custom at" morals" the top is lower and inferior because of having no any objective standard esse."但文化相对论之所以会持有这论点，应该是认为每一种文化都具有其独创性和充分的价值。每一种文化的建构，都有其独特的历史背景或是跟生活环境有关，所以任何不同文化做比较，都不应该以我族文化为中心而对其他文化的价值观作批判，而是应该以客观的立场，从客观的角度去看不同文化的习俗和传统，不仅要看它的文化传统是什麼，还要看为什麼会形成这样的传统习俗，对於不同於自己的任何文化，都有一份同情理解，或许那所谓的客观标准的存在与否，就不再那麼重要了。

作者强调即使不同文化都应该有一个共通的道德原则，也就是所谓的「普遍真理」，但是这或许只能说是这世界上的大部分人所共同达成的共识，那麼只被大部份人认同的，就算是普遍的真理吗？

基本上，作者所提出的文化差异辨证，本身也有可议之处。

Basically, the cultural difference dialectics put forward by author, oneself also have can the place of the argument.

作者在文中提出地球形状的例子，来说明『不相信』并不代表『不存在』，因此「各种文化有不同意见」并不代表「没有客观道德标准」。

The author puts forward the example of the Earth shape in the text, explain"believe" represent"nonexistent", so"various culture contain different opinion" represent"have no objective morals standard".

不过这样的论证的例子，从「可知的知识层面」谈到「各种文化的习俗」，却是相当不同的两种情形；

However such example of argument speak of"the custom of various culture" from"knowable knowledge level", is two kinds of very different situations;

因为地球形状是可以用各种方法加以验证的，最终可以得到一个正确答案；

Because the Earth shape can take in to verify with various method, end can get a right answer;

但是道德标准却是因人而异、随文化而变的，即使真有绝对客观的真理，又应该以何种文化为标准呢?

But, the morals standard vary from person to person and change with the culture, even really having objective truth absolutely, again should with what culture for standard?

道德并不像科学知识般可以加以验证的。

Morals" ising unlike the scientific knowledge sort also can take in to verify.

此外，既然文化相对主义主张文化没有优劣之分，那麼第一点提到的奴隶制度与屠杀犹太人的行为本身就已经是一种文化与人种的社会达尔文主义；

Cultural in addition and since the opposite doctrine lay claim to culture to have no the cent of[with] good and bad, that 麼 firstly speak of of the behavior of slave"s system and massacre Jew is already the social Darwinism of a kind of culture and human race;

作者提出我们应该批判纳粹德国与奴隶制度的不道德行为，不过这两种情形都是在「文化有优劣之别」的架构下所形塑而成的，因为这两者都是相信本身文化优於它种民族(与文化相对论的基本要素不合)，因此，也许我们应该重新检视纳粹德国与奴隶制度种种暴行的因果关系。

The author puts forward the dirty pool that we should criticize the Nazi Germany and slave"s system, however all of these two kinds of situations are under the structure of"the culture have good and bad do not" form and construct but become, this all of both are to believe oneself cultural excellent 於 it to grow race(out of accordance with an essential element of the cultural theory of relativity), therefore and perhaps we should re- examine the cause and effect relation between the Nazi Germany and slave"s system various unruly conductses.

如果世界都能普遍采用文化相对主义，那麼或许就没有上述所产生的问题了。

If world all ability widespread adoption culture opposite doctrine, that 麼 has no probably above-mentioned produce of problem.

作者并不十分赞同文化相对论的论点，他提出接受文化相对论的代价之一，就是「我们不能再去批判某一个社会的习俗在「道德」上较低劣的，因为没有任何客观的标准存在。

The author combine not quite agree with the talk point of the cultural theory of relativity, he puts forward one of the price that accepts the cultural theory of relativity, be"we can"t go to again to criticize the custom of a certain society is lower and inferior on"morals", because of having no objective standard existence.

」但文化相对论之所以会持有这论点，应该是认为每一种文化都具有其独创性和充分的价值。

"But the reason that the cultural theory of relativity will hold this talk point, should be think each time a kind of cultures to all have its unique with the full value.

每一种文化的建构，都有其独特的历史背景或是跟生活环境有关，所以任何不同文化做比较，都不应该以我族文化为中心而对其他文化的价值观作批判，而是应该以客观的立场，从客观的角度去看不同文化的习俗和传统，不仅要看它的文化传统是什麼，还要看为什麼会形成这样的传统习俗，对於不同於自己的任何文化，都有一份同情理解，或许那所谓的客观标准的存在与否，就不再那麼重要了。

Each kind of construction or purchase of culture, all have it special history background or have relation with living environment, so any different culture does a comparison, shouldn"t take my clan culture as center but as to it"s the value of his culture make judgment, but should with objective position, the custom and tradition for seeing different culture from the objective angle, not only needing to see its cultural tradition be the 什麼 , but also needing to see for the 什麼 will become such traditional custom, to 於 the different 於 is own any culture, all having a sympathetic toward comprehension, probably the existence of that so-called and objective standard or not, no longer that 麼 importance.

作者强调即使不同文化都应该有一个共通的道德原则，也就是所谓的「普遍真理」，但是这或许只能说是这世界上的大部分人所共同达成的共识，那麼只被大部份人认同的，就算是普遍的真理吗？

The author emphasize different cultures to even all should have a common morals principle, be also so-called"widespread truth", but this probably can say is this is in the world greatly parts of persons reach together of consensus, that 麼 is approve by most persons of, be regarded as widespread truth?

Basically, the author proposed cultural differences add itself also could be disputed. The text presented in the shape of the earth examples to illustrate the do not believe that the non-existence does not mean 』』, "cultures have different views" does not mean "no objective moral standards." But such arguments examples from the "known knowledge level" about the "cultural practices" is quite different in the two cases; shape of the Earth can be used as ways to certification, and ultimately could be a correct answer; But ethical standards are different, with the culture change, even if it has the absolute objective truth, Also what should be the standard for the culture? Ethics is not like scientific knowledge can be a certification.

Moreover, since the idea of cultural relativism merits of the sub-culture is not, then the first point mentioned slavery and the killing of Jews act itself is a cultural and ethnic social Darwinism; By the author of Nazi Germany and we should criticize the immoral acts of slavery, But in both cases are "culture of the merits of other" framework from the mold, which both believe themselves superior culture of its national (and not the basic elements of cultural relativism), Perhaps we should re-examine slavery and the atrocities of Nazi Germany causation. If the world can adopt universal cultural relativism, then perhaps there will be no problems arising from the above.

The author does not quite agree with the argument of cultural relativism, his acceptance of cultural relativism price one is "We can not go criticized the practices of a society in the" moral "than the poor, since no objective criteria exist. "But cultural relativism that would hold this argument should be that every culture is unique and has its full value. Each culture build on its unique historical background, or with the living environment, so any comparison of different cultures, should not in my ethnic culture as the center of other cultures and values for criticism, but should take an objective position from the objective point of view of different cultural customs and traditions, not only by its cultural traditions is what see why such a traditional practices, for any different from their own culture, there is a sympathetic understanding, and perhaps that the existence of the so-called objective criteria, It is no longer so important.

The authors stress that even if different cultures should have a common moral principles, namely the so-called "universal truth", but this can only say that perhaps this is the most people in the world have reached a common consensus, then the only recognized by most people, even a universal truth?

Basically, the author proposed cultural difference dialectical, itself also has may discuss place. The author in the article proposed the shape of the earth example, showed "did not believe" does not represent "does not exist", therefore "each kind of culture has the different opinion" not to represent "not the objective moral standard". But such proof example, from "the knowledge stratification plane which may know" talks about "each kind of cultural custom", is the quite different two kind of situations actually; Because the shape of the earth is may use each method to perform to confirm, finally may obtain a correct answer; But the moral standard is actually is different from person to person, but changes along with the culture, even if really has absolutely the objective truth, also should take what kind of culture as the standard?The morals do not like the scientific knowledge to be possible to perform to confirm.

In addition, since the cultural relativism advocated the culture does not have division of the fit and unfit quality, that □N first mentioned the slave system with slaughtered the Jew behavior itself already was one kind of cultural and race"s Social Darwinism; The author proposed we should criticize Nazi Germany and the slave system not the moral behavior, but these two kind of situations all are the overhead construction the shape model under "the culture has leaving of the fit and unfit quality" but become, because these two all is believed the itself culture surpasses it to plant the nationality (not to gather with cultural theory of relativity basic essential factor), therefore, perhaps we should reinspect Nazi Germany and the slave system all sorts of atrocities causal relation. If the world all can use the cultural relativism generally, perhaps that □N did not have the question which above produced.

The author not extremely approves of the cultural theory of relativity the argument, he proposed accepts one of cultural theory of relativity prices, is "we cannot criticize some social again the custom in" the morals "on inferior, because does not have any objective standard existence." But the cultural theory of relativity the reason that can have this argument, should be thought each kind of culture all has its originality and the full value. Each kind of cultural constructing, all has its unique historical background perhaps with the living conditions related, therefore any different culture makes the comparison, all should not but make the critique take my race culture as the center to other cultural values, but is should by the objective standpoint, looks at different cultural from the objective angle the custom and the tradition, not only must think its cultural tradition is assorted □N, but also must look can form such traditional custom for assorted □N, regarding is different with own any culture, all some sympathetic understanding, perhaps that so-called objective standard existence or not, Was important on no longer that □N.

The author emphasized even if the different culture all should have a common moral principle, also is so-called "the universal truth", perhaps but this only can say is mutual recognition which in this world majority of people achieves together, that □N is approved only by the major part person, even if is the universal truth?

谢谢

Basically, the author proposed cultural difference dialectical, itself also has may discuss place. The author in the article proposed the shape of the earth example, showed "did not believe" certainly does not represent "does not exist", therefore "each kind of culture has the different opinion" certainly not to represent "not the objective moral standard". But such proof example, from "the knowledge stratification plane which may know" talks about "each kind of cultural custom", actually is the quite different two kind of situations; Because the shape of the earth is may use each method to perform to confirm, finally may obtain a correct answer; But the moral standard actually is different from person to person, even if really has absolutely the objective truth which changes along with the culture, also should take what kind of culture as the standard? The morals certainly do not like the scientific knowledge to be allowed to perform to confirm.

In addition, since the cultural relativism advocated the culture does not have division of the fit and unfit quality, that and first mentioned the slave system with slaughtered the Jew behavior itself already was one kind of cultural and race"s Social Darwinism; The author proposed we should criticize Nazi Germany and the slave system not the moral behavior, because these two all is believed the itself culture which but these two kind of situations all are under "the culture has leaving of the fit and unfit quality" the overhead construction the shape model become surpasses it to plant the nationality (not to gather with cultural theory of relativity basic essential factor), therefore, perhaps we should reinspect Nazi Germany and the slave system all sorts of atrocities causal relation. If the world all can generally use the cultural relativism, perhaps that when did not have the question which above produced.

The author certainly not extremely approves of the cultural theory of relativity the argument, he proposed accepts one of cultural theory of relativity prices, is "we cannot criticize some social again the custom in" the morals "on more inferior, because does not have any objective standard existence." But cultural theory of relativity therefore can have this argument, should be thought each kind of culture all has its originality and the full value. Each kind of culture constructs the construction, all has its unique historical background perhaps with the living conditions related, therefore any different culture makes the comparison, all should not but make the critique take my race culture as the center to other cultural values, but is should by the objective standpoint, looks at different cultural from the objective angle the custom and the tradition, not only must think its cultural tradition is assorted lose, but also must look for is assorted dhf can form such traditional custom, regarding is different with own any culture, all some sympathetic understanding, perhaps that so-called objective standard existence or not, No longer that be was important.

The author emphasized even if the different culture all should have a common moral principle, also is so-called "the universal truth", perhaps but this only can say is mutual recognition which in this world majority of people achieves together, that is only approved by the major part person, is the universal truth?

或Basically, the author proposed cultural difference dialectical, itself also has may discuss place. The author in the article proposed the shape of the earth example, showed "did not believe" certainly does not represent "does not exist", therefore "each kind of culture has the different opinion" certainly not to represent "not the objective moral standard". But such proof example, from "the knowledge stratification plane which may know" talks about "each kind of cultural custom", actually is the quite different two kind of situations; Because the shape of the earth is may use each method to perform to confirm, finally may obtain a correct answer; But the moral standard actually is different from person to person, even if really has absolutely the objective truth which changes along with the culture, also should take what kind of culture as the standard? The morals certainly do not like the scientific knowledge to be allowed to perform to confirm.

In addition, since the cultural relativism advocated the culture does not have division of the fit and unfit quality, that □first mentioned the slave system with slaughtered the Jew behavior itself already was one kind of cultural and race"s Social Darwinism; The author proposed we should criticize Nazi Germany and the slave system not the moral behavior, because these two all is believed the itself culture which but these two kind of situations all are under "the culture has leaving of the fit and unfit quality" the overhead construction the shape model become surpasses it to plant the nationality (not to gather with cultural theory of relativity basic essential factor), therefore, perhaps we should reinspect Nazi Germany and the slave system all sorts of atrocities causal relation. If the world all can generally use the cultural relativism, perhaps that □did not have the question which above produced.

The author certainly not extremely approves of the cultural theory of relativity the argument, he proposed accepts one of cultural theory of relativity prices, is "we cannot criticize some social again the custom in" the morals "on more inferior, because does not have any objective standard existence." But cultural theory of relativity therefore can have this argument, should be thought each kind of culture all has its originality and the full value. Each kind of culture constructs the construction, all has its unique historical background perhaps with the living conditions related, therefore any different culture makes the comparison, all should not but make the critique take my race culture as the center to other cultural values, but is should by the objective standpoint, looks at different cultural from the objective angle the custom and the tradition, not only must think its cultural tradition is assorted □, but also must look for is assorted □can form such traditional custom, regarding is different with own any culture, all some sympathetic understanding, perhaps that so-called objective standard existence or not, No longer that □was important.

The author emphasized even if the different culture all should have a common moral principle, also is so-called "the universal truth", perhaps but this only can say is mutual recognition which in this world majority of people achieves together, that □is only approved by the major part person, is the universal truth?

Basically, the author proposed cultural difference dialectical, itself also has may discuss place. The author in the article proposed the shape of the earth example, showed "did not believe" certainly does not represent "does not exist", therefore "each kind of culture has the different opinion" certainly not to represent "not the objective moral standard". But such proof example, from "the knowledge stratification plane which may know" talks about "each kind of cultural custom", actually is the quite different two kind of situations; Because the shape of the earth is may use each method to perform to confirm, finally may obtain a correct answer; But the moral standard actually is different from person to person, even if really has absolutely the objective truth which changes along with the culture, also should take what kind of culture as the standard? The morals certainly do not like the scientific knowledge to be allowed to perform to confirm.

In addition, since the cultural relativism advocated the culture does not have division of the fit and unfit quality, that □first mentioned the slave system with slaughtered the Jew behavior itself already was one kind of cultural and race"s Social Darwinism; The author proposed we should criticize Nazi Germany and the slave system not the moral behavior, because these two all is believed the itself culture which but these two kind of situations all are under "the culture has leaving of the fit and unfit quality" the overhead construction the shape model become surpasses it to plant the nationality (not to gather with cultural theory of relativity basic essential factor), therefore, perhaps we should reinspect Nazi Germany and the slave system all sorts of atrocities causal relation. If the world all can generally use the cultural relativism, perhaps that □did not have the question which above produced.

The author certainly not extremely approves of the cultural theory of relativity the argument, he proposed accepts one of cultural theory of relativity prices, is "we cannot criticize some social again the custom in" the morals "on more inferior, because does not have any objective standard existence." But cultural theory of relativity therefore can have this argument, should be thought each kind of culture all has its originality and the full value. Each kind of culture constructs the construction, all has its unique historical background perhaps with the living conditions related, therefore any different culture makes the comparison, all should not but make the critique take my race culture as the center to other cultural values, but is should by the objective standpoint, looks at different cultural from the objective angle the custom and the tradition, not only must think its cultural tradition is assorted □, but also must look for is assorted □can form such traditional custom, regarding is different with own any culture, all some sympathetic understanding, perhaps that so-called objective standard existence or not, No longer that □was important.

The author emphasized even if the different culture all should have a common moral principle, also is so-called "the universal truth", perhaps but this only can say is mutual recognition which in this world majority of people achieves together, that □is only approved by the major part person, is the universal truth?

回答者：mmbgw - 试用期 一级 3-8 18:11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basically, the author proposed cultural differences add itself also could be disputed. The text presented in the shape of the earth examples to illustrate the do not believe that the non-existence does not mean 』』, "cultures have different views" does not mean "no objective moral standards." But such arguments examples from the "known knowledge level" about the "cultural practices" is quite different in the two cases;

shape of the Earth can be used as ways to certification, and ultimately could be a correct answer;

But ethical standards are different, with the culture change, even if it has the absolute objective truth, Also what should be the standard for the culture?

Ethics is not like scientific knowledge can be a certification. Moreover, since the idea of cultural relativism merits of the sub-culture is not, then the first point mentioned slavery and the killing of Jews act itself is a cultural and ethnic social Darwinism;

by the author of Nazi Germany and we should criticize the immoral acts of slavery, But in both cases are "culture of the merits of other" framework from the mold, which both believe themselves superior culture of its national (and not the basic elements of cultural relativism), Perhaps we should re-examine slavery and the atrocities of Nazi Germany causation. If the world can adopt universal cultural relativism, then perhaps there will be no problems arising from the above. The author does not quite agree with the argument of cultural relativism, his acceptance of cultural relativism price one is "We can not go criticized the practices of a society in the" moral "than the poor, since no objective criteria exist. "But cultural relativism that would hold this argument should be that every culture is unique and has its full value. Each culture build on its unique historical background, or with the living environment, so any comparison of different cultures, should not in my ethnic culture as the center of other cultures and values for criticism, but should take an objective position from the objective point of view of different cultural customs and traditions, not only by its cultural traditions is what see why such a traditional practices, for any different from their own culture, there is a sympathetic understanding, and perhaps that the existence of the so-called objective criteria, It is no longer so important. The authors stress that even if different cultures should have a common moral principles, namely the so-called "universal truth", but this can only say that perhaps this is the most people in the world have reached a common consensus, then the only recognized by most people, even a universal truth?

Basically, the cultural difference dialectics put forward by author, oneself also have can the place of the argument.The author puts forward the example of the Earth shape in the text, explain"believe" represent"nonexistent", so"various culture contain different opinion" represent"have no objective morals standard".However such example of argument speak of"the custom of various culture" from"knowable knowledge level", is two kinds of very different situations;Because the Earth shape can take in to verify with various method, end can get a right answer;But, the morals standard vary from person to person and change with the culture, even really having objective truth absolutely, again should with what culture for standard?Morals" ising unlike the scientific knowledge sort also can take in to verify.

Cultural in addition and since the opposite doctrine lay claim to culture to have no the cent of[with] good and bad, so the firstly speak of of the behavior of slave"s system and massacre Jew is already the social Darwinism of a kind of culture and human race;The author puts forward the dirty pool that we should criticize the Nazi Germany and slave"s system, however all of these two kinds of situations are under the structure of"the culture have good and bad do not" form and construct but become, this all of both are to believe oneself culture better than it grows race(out of accordance with an essential element of the cultural theory of relativity), therefore and perhaps we should re- examine the cause and effect relation between the Nazi Germany and slave"s system various unruly conductses.If world all ability widespread adoption culture opposite doctrine, have no so and probably above-mentioned produce of problem.

The author combine not quite agree with the talk point of the cultural theory of relativity, he puts forward one of the price that accepts the cultural theory of relativity, be"we can"t go to again to criticize the custom of a certain society is lower and inferior on"morals", because of having no objective standard existence."But the reason that the cultural theory of relativity will hold this talk point, should be think each time a kind of cultures to all have its unique with the full value.Each kind of construction or purchase of culture, all have it special history background or have relation with living environment, so any different culture does a comparison, shouldn"t take my clan culture as center but as to it"s the value of his culture make judgment, but should with objective position, see the custom and tradition of the different culture from the objective angle, not only need to see its cultural tradition is what, also need to see why will become such traditional custom for differing from own any culture, all have a sympathetic toward comprehension, probably the existence of that so-called and objective standard or not, no longer so important.

The author emphasize different cultures to even all should have a common morals principle, be also so-called"widespread truth", but this probably can say is this is in the world greatly parts of persons reach together of consensus, so is approve by most persons of, be regarded as widespread truth?

Basically, the author proposed cultural difference dialectical, itself also has may discuss place. The author in the article proposed the shape of the earth example, showed "did not believe" certainly does not represent "does not exist", therefore "each kind of culture has the different opinion" certainly not to represent "not the objective moral standard". But such proof example, from "the knowledge stratification plane which may know" talks about "each kind of cultural custom", actually is the quite different two kind of situations; Because the shape of the earth is may use each method to perform to confirm, finally may obtain a correct answer; But the moral standard actually is different from person to person, even if really has absolutely the objective truth which changes along with the culture, also should take what kind of culture as the standard? The morals certainly do not like the scientific knowledge to be allowed to perform to confirm. In addition, since the cultural relativism advocated the culture does not have division of the fit and unfit quality, that □first mentioned the slave system with slaughtered the Jew behavior itself already was one kind of cultural and race"s Social Darwinism; The author proposed we should criticize Nazi Germany and the slave system not the moral behavior, because these two all is believed the itself culture which but these two kind of situations all are under "the culture has leaving of the fit and unfit quality" the overhead construction the shape model become surpasses it to plant the nationality (not to gather with cultural theory of relativity basic essential factor), therefore, perhaps we should reinspect Nazi Germany and the slave system all sorts of atrocities causal relation. If the world all can generally use the cultural relativism, perhaps that □did not have the question which above produced. The author certainly not extremely approves of the cultural theory of relativity the argument, he proposed accepts one of cultural theory of relativity prices, is "we cannot criticize some social again the custom in" the morals "on more inferior, because does not have any objective standard existence." But cultural theory of relativity therefore can have this argument, should be thought each kind of culture all has its originality and the full value. Each kind of culture constructs the construction, all has its unique historical background perhaps with the living conditions related, therefore any different culture makes the comparison, all should not but make the critique take my race culture as the center to other cultural values, but is should by the objective standpoint, looks at different cultural from the objective angle the custom and the tradition, not only must think its cultural tradition is assorted □, but also must look for is assorted □can form such traditional custom, regarding is different with own any culture, all some sympathetic understanding, perhaps that so-called objective standard existence or not, No longer that □was important. The author emphasized even if the different culture all should have a common moral principle, also is so-called "the universal truth", perhaps but this only can say is mutual recognition which in this world majority of people achieves together, that □is only approved by the major part person, is the universal truth?

Basically, the cultural difference dialectics that author put forward, oneself also have can the place of the argument.The author puts forward the example of the Earth shape in the text, explain that" not believe" does not represent" nonexistent", so" various culture contain different opinion" does not represent" have no objective morals standard".However such example of argument, speak of" the custom of various culture" from" knowable knowledge level", is two kinds of very different situations;Because the Earth shape is to take into the verification with various method of, end can get a right answer;But morals standard but is to vary from person to person and change with the culture of, even really have the absolute objective truth, again should with what culture is standard?The morals is unlike the scientific knowledge sort and cans take into the verification also of.

In addition, since the opposite doctrine of cultural lay claim to the culture to without good and bad cent, the behavior of slave"s system and massacre Jew that that firstly of 麼 speak of is already social Darwinism of a kind of culture and human races;The author put forward our should criticize the Nazi Germany and institutional dirty pool of slave, however these two kinds of situations are all under the structure of" the culture contain good and bad it do not" form and construct but become of, because this both are all believe oneself excellent 於 of cultural it grow the race( out of accordance with an essential element of the cultural theory of relativity), therefore, perhaps we should re- examine the Nazi Germany and the cause and effect relation of slave"s system various unruly conducts.If world all opposite doctrine of widespread adoption culture of ability, that 麼 had no the problem that the above-mentioned produce probably.

The author combines the talk point of the not quite approval cultural theory of relativity, he puts forward one of the price that accepts the cultural theory of relativity, be" we can"t go to again to criticize the custom of a certain society is lower and inferior on" morals", because of have no objective standard existence." But the reason that the cultural theory of relativity will hold this talk point, should be to think that each culture has the its unique and full value.Each construction or purchase of culture, all have it the special history background or have relation with living environment, so any different culture does the comparison, shouldn"t take my clan culture as the center but as to it"s the value of his culture makes the judgment, but should with objective position, see own any culture of different from tradition, not only needing to see its cultural tradition is the 什麼 , but also needing to see for the 什麼 will become the thus traditional custom, to the 於於 of the custom of different culture from the objective angle, all have a sympathetic toward comprehension, probably the existence of that so-called and objective standard or not, no longer that 麼 importance.

The author emphasize even different cultures should have a common morals principle, is also so-called" widespread truth", but this probably and only can say is this is in the world big and parts of person reach together of consensus, that 麼 only drive most person approbation of, be regarded as the widespread truth?

Basically, the cultural difference dialectics put forward by author, oneself also have can the place of the argument.The author puts forward the example of the Earth shape in the text, explain"believe" represent"nonexistent", so"various culture contain different opinion" represent"have no objective morals standard".However such example of argument speak of"the custom of various culture" from"knowable knowledge level", is two kinds of very different situations;Because the Earth shape can take in to verify with various method, end can get a right answer;But, the morals standard vary from person to person and change with the culture, even really having objective truth absolutely, again should with what culture for standard?Morals" ising unlike the scientific knowledge sort also can take in to verify.

Cultural in addition and since the opposite doctrine lay claim to culture to have no the cent of[with] good and bad, that 麼 firstly speak of of the behavior of slave"s system and massacre Jew is already the social Darwinism of a kind of culture and human race;The author puts forward the dirty pool that we should criticize the Nazi Germany and slave"s system, however all of these two kinds of situations are under the structure of"the culture have good and bad do not" form and construct but become, this all of both are to believe oneself cultural excellent 於 it to grow race(out of accordance with an essential element of the cultural theory of relativity), therefore and perhaps we should re- examine the cause and effect relation between the Nazi Germany and slave"s system various unruly conductses.If world all ability widespread adoption culture opposite doctrine, that 麼 has no probably above-mentioned produce of problem.

The author combine not quite agree with the talk point of the cultural theory of relativity, he puts forward one of the price that accepts the cultural theory of relativity, be"we can"t go to again to criticize the custom of a certain society is lower and inferior on"morals", because of having no objective standard existence."But the reason that the cultural theory of relativity will hold this talk point, should be think each time a kind of cultures to all have its unique with the full value.Each kind of construction or purchase of culture, all have it special history background or have relation with living environment, so any different culture does a comparison, shouldn"t take my clan culture as center but as to it"s the value of his culture make judgment, but should with objective position, the custom and tradition for seeing different culture from the objective angle, not only needing to see its cultural tradition be the 什麼 , but also needing to see for the 什麼 will become such traditional custom, to 於 the different 於 is own any culture, all having a sympathetic toward comprehension, probably the existence of that so-called and objective standard or not, no longer that 麼 importance.

The author emphasize different cultures to even all should have a common morals principle, be also so-called"widespread truth", but this probably can say is this is in the world greatly parts of persons reach together of consensus, that 麼 is approve by most persons of, be regarded as widespread truth?

Basically, the author proposed cultural difference dialectical, itself also has may discuss place. The author in the article proposed the shape of the earth example, showed "did not believe" does not represent "does not exist", therefore "each kind of culture has the different opinion" not to represent "not the objective moral standard". But such proof example, from "the knowledge stratification plane which may know" talks about "each kind of cultural custom", is the quite different two kind of situations actually; Because the shape of the earth is may use each method to perform to confirm, finally may obtain a correct answer; But the moral standard is actually is different from person to person, but changes along with the culture, even if really has absolutely the objective truth, also should take what kind of culture as the standard?The morals do not like the scientific knowledge to be possible to perform to confirm.

In addition, since the cultural relativism advocated the culture does not have division of the fit and unfit quality, that □N first mentioned the slave system with slaughtered the Jew behavior itself already was one kind of cultural and race"s Social Darwinism; The author proposed we should criticize Nazi Germany and the slave system not the moral behavior, but these two kind of situations all are the overhead construction the shape model under "the culture has leaving of the fit and unfit quality" but become, because these two all is believed the itself culture surpasses it to plant the nationality (not to gather with cultural theory of relativity basic essential factor), therefore, perhaps we should reinspect Nazi Germany and the slave system all sorts of atrocities causal relation. If the world all can use the cultural relativism generally, perhaps that □N did not have the question which above produced.

The author not extremely approves of the cultural theory of relativity the argument, he proposed accepts one of cultural theory of relativity prices, is "we cannot criticize some social again the custom in" the morals "on inferior, because does not have any objective standard existence." But the cultural theory of relativity the reason that can have this argument, should be thought each kind of culture all has its originality and the full value. Each kind of cultural constructing, all has its unique historical background perhaps with the living conditions related, therefore any different culture makes the comparison, all should not but make the critique take my race culture as the center to other cultural values, but is should by the objective standpoint, looks at different cultural from the objective angle the custom and the tradition, not only must think its cultural tradition is assorted □N, but also must look can form such traditional custom for assorted □N, regarding is different with own any culture, all some sympathetic understanding, perhaps that so-called objective standard existence or not, Was important on no longer that □N.

The author emphasized even if the different culture all should have a common moral principle, also is so-called "the universal truth", perhaps but this only can say is mutual recognition which in this world majority of people achieves together, that □N is approved only by the major part person, even if is the universal truth?

Basically, the author proposed cultural difference dialectical, itself also has may discuss place. The author in the article proposed the shape of the earth example, showed "did not believe" certainly does not represent "does not exist", therefore "each kind of culture has the different opinion" certainly not to represent "not the objective moral standard". But such proof example, from "the knowledge stratification plane which may know" talks about "each kind of cultural custom", actually is the quite different two kind of situations; Because the shape of the earth is may use each method to perform to confirm, finally may obtain a correct answer; But the moral standard actually is different from person to person, even if really has absolutely the objective truth which changes along with the culture, also should take what kind of culture as the standard? The morals certainly do not like the scientific knowledge to be allowed to perform to confirm.

In addition, since the cultural relativism advocated the culture does not have division of the fit and unfit quality, that □first mentioned the slave system with slaughtered the Jew behavior itself already was one kind of cultural and race"s Social Darwinism; The author proposed we should criticize Nazi Germany and the slave system not the moral behavior, because these two all is believed the itself culture which but these two kind of situations all are under "the culture has leaving of the fit and unfit quality" the overhead construction the shape model become surpasses it to plant the nationality (not to gather with cultural theory of relativity basic essential factor), therefore, perhaps we should reinspect Nazi Germany and the slave system all sorts of atrocities causal relation. If the world all can generally use the cultural relativism, perhaps that □did not have the question which above produced.

The author certainly not extremely approves of the cultural theory of relativity the argument, he proposed accepts one of cultural theory of relativity prices, is "we cannot criticize some social again the custom in" the morals "on more inferior, because does not have any objective standard existence." But cultural theory of relativity therefore can have this argument, should be thought each kind of culture all has its originality and the full value. Each kind of culture constructs the construction, all has its unique historical background perhaps with the living conditions related, therefore any different culture makes the comparison, all should not but make the critique take my race culture as the center to other cultural values, but is should by the objective standpoint, looks at different cultural from the objective angle the custom and the tradition, not only must think its cultural tradition is assorted □, but also must look for is assorted □can form such traditional custom, regarding is different with own any culture, all some sympathetic understanding, perhaps that so-called objective standard existence or not, No longer that □was important.

The author emphasized even if the different culture all should have a common moral principle, also is so-called "the universal truth", perhaps but this only can say is mutual recognition which in this world majority of people achieves together, that □is only approved by the major part person, is the universal truth?